Jun 20
email

I learned a valuable lesson a few years back.  I was managing a sales team of thirteen B2B sales people in the recruitment industry (They weren’t quite as green as Gary’s list, but we had a few rookies in the mix).  We had a Monday morning breakfast meeting every week where we would talk about the week that was, how we are tracking for the quarter, the plan for the week ahead etc…  Following a period of over-performance, I would tell the team about how great we were doing and pump up the individuals who performed well etc…. So to, after a ‘slower’ results period, I would talk to the team about how we as a team were underperforming and what we all need to do to correct the situation, but remaining vigilant in giving recognition to the top performers. Situational & Behavioral Interviewing for the Sales Profession

The problem was this: Although a team is a team, when things are going badly, not ‘everyone’ is to blame.  So to sit your team down as a whole and tell them they need to pull up their socks, is not an ideal thing for the ‘top performers’ to be a part of.  The message you’re giving to those top performers is inconsistent with their results. “Why do I have to listen to this, I doubled my budget last month!” they may think to themselves.  I learned during an exit interview with one of my better performers that he felt exactly this way. 

If you have a sustained period of underperformance, the message can also get very old and have a detrimental impact on morale across the group, including your top performers. 

The other down side to addressing the entire team with negative messaging such as this is that you give underperformers an excuse: “Oh, so we’re all underperforming. It must just be a tough market.  Although I would like to improve my situation, I don’t feel any pressure to, because we are all struggling. He can’t sack all of us”.  I learned that ‘misery loves company’ and it can breed. 

I’ve since learned to isolate negative messages to those that need to hear them.  This saves the top performers from needing to hear about it and tends to ensure that underperformers have less company and make fewer excuses.  This creates more expectation on them to correct their situation and in my experience, they are far more likely to do so in this environment.  The top performers are also happier and feel more recognised.  The entire team has a more upbeat place to work, resulting in better retention and engagement across the board and higher morale.



P.S. – For more sales insights, SUBSCRIBE for email updates.


Free Download:
Situational & Behavioral Interviewing
for the Sales ProfessionHarlow Group Whitepaper

Sales Managers are met with the ultimate challenge when interviewing sales people. Underequipped, rarely with any education in HR, they are interviewing the best interviewees there are; sales people! What questions should you be asking these candidates in order to understand whether or not they can perform the tasks of the position and ultimately achieve budget? How do you tailor these questions to suit your company and this particular position? Furthermore, how do you cut through the sales speak and find out if this person is genuine and has achieved targets in the past? This white paper answers all of the above.
This free white paper is currently in the final stages of preparation.

 

Register here to receive the White Paper when it is first released

 

Your Email (the white paper will be sent to your inbox)

Your Full Name (required)


We respect your email privacy.
Tagged with:
May 25

“There is no doubt in my mind that to create a world class sales team, you need to know how to identify talent outside of your own industry.  Identifying common ESF’s is the first step in widening the talent pool available to you.”

When hiring sales people, many sales managers seek out someone from within their particular industry, thus minimising risk, with the understanding that a person from within the industry is accustomed to selling in the ‘environment’ in which they operate.  The pro’s and con’s of this selection strategy have been discussed in a previous post.  Although there are some great examples of hiring decisions made in this manner, this strategy often leads to us making a decision from a VERY ‘short’ list of candidates that happen to be on the market within our industry.

Look at the last few hiring decisions you’ve made in your sales team.  How many candidates did you have to choose from that you thought could actually do the job?  Most sales managers who like to hire from within their industry exclusively, would say, “One; and I had a vacant territory for around five months, costing me big money whilst I searched for them.  We missed budget because of it”.  This is understandable and common; after all we are in the midst of an acute skills shortage that I believe has hit the sales profession more than most (a subject for another post).  Often this person wasn’t the best of what the industry had to offer; they gained the job by default, they were the only one there!  So how can we expect to create a ‘best of breed’ sales force to beat our competitors if we are often recycling the sales people they let go?  The fact is this strategy severely limits the talent available to you when selecting the best sales person for the job.  It’s my belief that this selection strategy is born out of a lack of education on recruitment strategy or hesitance through fear of getting it wrong.  “Last time we hired from outside of the industry, they just didn’t get it.”  If every time we made an error, we never tried again, we would still be in the Stone Age.  It’s having the know-how that can change this.  The challenge is that most sales managers come from a sales background – they have little to no education on recruitment strategy, so they go for the safety of hiring from within the industry.

In all likelihood, the best sales person for your business on the market right now is not currently working with one of your competitors; but how do you know if they can make the transition across to your industry?  Well, without meeting them you won’t know – and in my experience, many great sales people are overlooked at resume screening stage due to a lack of industry experience (ever heard this one before?). 

Does this mean you should meet every experienced sales person that applies for the position?  Of course not, you’ve got better things to do with your time.  So how do you ensure you don’t miss that diamond candidate in the resumes hitting your inbox?

Consider this; there are other industries that face similar challenges to your own throughout the sales process.  Perhaps your sales people are challenged by the ‘type’ of decision maker the sell to (be it a CFO or HR Director etc.), or the fact they are required to be more of a ‘trusted advisor’ than a slick sales person (often the case in the professional services space).  Or perhaps your solution is particularly technical and requires that rare mix between a technical mind and a strong communicator.  These are not factors that are common across all industries, however there are some industries that do share these challenges.  Once you isolate the key challenges faced in the sales process in your industry, you can then go about isolating industries that share common ground in these areas.  Upon meeting sales people that have come from these alternate industries but share the ‘Environmental Selling Factors’ of your industry, you will be re-invigorated about sourcing talented sales people for your business.  You’ll have a new found understanding that you actually have far more talent to choose from than what you thought.

Here are the top 12 Environmental Selling Factors you should consider when sizing up candidates:

1.                  Commodity Selling Versus Value Selling.
Senior level management will rarely get involved in buying commodity products.  After all, the vendors are all offering solutions that are very comparable (by definition).  These buying decisions are mostly made at procurement level.  Someone that is accustomed to influencing at the ‘C’ level is unlikely to be effective when dealing with procurement and may not appreciate what drives decision making at this level.  The same can certainly be said visa-versa.  Often one is a price sell where the other is what many call a ‘solution’ sell, where problems are solved or efficiencies are improved, or previously unrecognised more effective ways of doing business are discovered (often the case with technology solutions).  In these situations, clients are quite prepared to pay a premium, as a clear return on investment can be argued.

Situational & Behavioral Interviewing for the Sales Profession2.                  ‘Technical’ Solution Selling
This is where one of the most severe skills shortages exists in the sales profession.  You’re selling contract pharmaceutical manufacturing to pharma marketing companies, or you sell raw chemicals to manufacturers.  You really need a brainiac with a science degree with the communication and sales skills to boot.  Often these skills are mutually exclusive by way of interest (scientists don’t like to sell and visa-versa); but when you find someone with the rare combination, you’re onto a winner.  Many engineering based industries have this challenge.  Perhaps they could be cross pollinating rather than limiting themselves to recycling their competitor’s staff?

3.                  Collaborative Versus Solo Selling
Collaborative sales environments are often found in the professional services space (among others).  You need to gain the buy in of internal delivery staff who will in the end be your ‘product’.  They will be delivering a bespoke solution that the sales person needs to design with the delivery team in the best interest of the client.  The sales person takes the time to understand the client’s needs, communicate them back to the delivery team and together they develop the solution to pitch to the client.  This involves selling both externally and internally and requires great stakeholder management, listening and influencing skills.  For example, the IT systems integration / consulting industry share this commonality with the management consulting industry.  Could these industries consider talent from one another, thus increasing the talent pool available to them?

4.                  Flexible Solution Versus Rigid Solution
Going into a sales call with a pre-conceived understanding of what you are going to sell to them based on the fact your product is one-dimensional, is an entirely different sales process to having any number of malleable solutions to offer a client dependant on their needs or business opportunities.

5.                  Trusted Advisor Selling (Creative Selling)
In many cases (particularly in the ‘flexible solution environment’ listed above) the sales person must position themselves as a ‘trusted advisor’ to the client; advising that a solution be built and delivered in a certain way, or advising the client on how they can go about achieving a better business outcome through doing things differently.  This is a fine skill that is typically only mastered after many years in the sales profession.  It requires a quiet confidence, composure, deliberate communication style and advanced commercial acumen.

6.                  Length of Sales Cycle
When selling strategically over a period of twelve months and five (plus) sales calls in order to bring in a piece of business, someone who is used to a shorter sales cycle may become impatient and lose motivation as they are used to ‘winning’ on a more regular basis.  They may feel a need to ‘close’ often and throughout the sales process, which will bring a sales person undone in this environment.  Strategic selling involves understanding your clients business at the deepest level and the ability to formulate bespoke solutions.  A shorter sales cycle may simply require one or two meetings, some discovery questions, a presentation, a Q and A and a close; two very different skills-sets required.  However, often sales people progress from one to the other over time.

7.                  Average Sale Value
Dealing with large scale decisions where significant capital outlay is required takes a certain skill-set and persona in order to be trusted by a client with such a commitment.  This is less about industry and more about seniority of sales position.  Selling a smaller solution may involve one decision maker where selling a larger scale solution may involve you needing to influence five key stakeholders and have them reach agreement with one another.  This involves an intricate understanding of organisational structure, behavior and business drivers and may require someone with greater commercial acumen and business experience.

8.                  Average Unit Price
Selling pens (regardless of the volume) takes a different skill-set to selling industrial capital equipment.

9.                  Markets Sold To
The buying behavior of government departments can be vastly different to that of a top 500 company, albeit they may both be making large scale purchases.  The motives in such buying decisions will often vary greatly, as will the process prospective vendors have to go through to be successful.

10.             Level Of Decision Maker Sold To
A CFO is driven to make decisions on entirely different criteria to that of a Marketing Manager.  Even personality types typically vary between job functions.  Knowing how an HR Manager typically thinks; how and why they make decisions and so forth, can be a great asset to a sales person.  You may sell Human Capital Management Software to HR leaders within large corporations.  Perhaps a sales person from a leadership training company would be worth talking to.  Both industries sell to HR decision makers and understand the typical buying drivers and behavior.

11.             Product Versus Service
Selling a product that can be touched, felt and demonstrated in action, is vastly different to selling something than cannot be seen, but can only be described.  The skill-sets involved with each sales process often vary greatly.  Sales people can sometimes struggle to make the transition from one to the other.

12.             New Business Versus Account Management
Perhaps this one goes without saying.  I’ve seen many sales people fail in making the transition from one to the other.  We must remember selling is not selling, even if someone comes from the same industry.  In this case, the day-to-day tasks and often the personal ‘make-up’ and occupational interests of the individuals a vastly different from one another. 

 So ask yourself; which of the above environments exist in your industry.  Sales people coming from alternative industries that have conquered these same selling environments may be quite capable of making a successful transition into your company.  Therefore, you have brought an enthusiastic new entrant into the industry that is keen to learn and do things ‘the company way’ rather than saying “at ABC and Co (your competitor) we didn’t do it this way”. This new entrant is stimulated by your industry (it’s new to them) and has no pre-conceived notions of how things should be done.  They are not underwhelmed about what your company does, having been in the industry for 20 years and a little ‘over it’.  Furthermore, they bring new ideas; and although of course many of them may be misguided initially, as they develop, their slightly different way of looking at things is sure to add value to company processes and selling strategies.

 The obvious benefit of being able to identify these ESF’s (Environmental Selling Factors) is increasing the number of sales people you have to choose from when hiring, thus improving the quality of sales talent in your organisation.  You can then focus on getting the person with the best selling skills with an aim to attract someone that is in the top 10% of sales people in Australia, rather than choosing from the one or two people you have in front of you from your competition.  If you did have people that only represented the top 10% of sales professionals, what could this do to your sales numbers over time?

The immediate challenge is learning how to identify the ESF’s in prospective CV’s and understanding the industries these candidates are likely to coming from.  If you’re like most successful sales managers, you’ve only worked in two to three industries over your time, so how are you to know the common ESF’s that others industries may share with your own?  This can take a lifetime of recruiting sales people or a strong recruitment partner that is able to be your ‘trusted advisor’ in your recruitment strategy development and deployment.  It may help to work with a specialist sales recruiter with many years experience to guide you through it and suggest industries to consider sales people from that have already mastered the ESF’s that exist within your industry.  If you’re short on such a contact, I can point you in the direction of a number of good consultants (cheap plug).

If you are a sales person looking to make a transition across industry, perhaps you can consider the above.  Which industries share the ESF’s that you have mastered over your career?  Perhaps these are the industries you should be pursuing. 

Without the common ESF’s, can a successful transition be made? 
Of course it can sometimes be made, with a healthy investment in professional development and plenty of time to be given to the prospective candidate to create success.  Unfortunately, not many companies are able to or are prepared to make such an investment.  However many acceptations are out there; companies that are more than prepared to make this investment in sales people early in their career.  Often the salary is not substantial at first as the company is investing in your development and is prepared to wait longer for their return on investment.  Unfortunately for those advanced in their sales career, asking $100,000 plus salary without any common ESF experience is unlikely to come off (of course there are exceptions).  This is due to the fact that this sort of salary normally demands a faster return on investment, larger result expectations, and lower risk (if you’ve not done it before, you are high risk, like it or not).

I hope this article has inspired you to lift the bar in considering what sales talent looks like and where it can be found.  There is no doubt in my mind that to create a world class sales team, you need to know how to identify talent outside of your own industry.  Identifying common ESF’s is the first step in widening the talent pool available to you.   Of course once you have a selection of talented sales people to choose from, you’ll need to learn how to employ situational and behavioral interview techniques to help determine which of the people you have in front of you has best performed in these common ‘Selling Environments’.

Steve.       
   
P.S. – For more sales insights, SUBSCRIBE for email updates.

Free Download:
Situational & Behavioral Interviewing
for the Sales ProfessionHarlow Group Whitepaper

Sales Managers are met with the ultimate challenge when interviewing sales people. Underequipped, rarely with any education in HR, they are interviewing the best interviewees there are; sales people! What questions should you be asking these candidates in order to understand whether or not they can perform the tasks of the position and ultimately achieve budget? How do you tailor these questions to suit your company and this particular position? Furthermore, how do you cut through the sales speak and find out if this person is genuine and has achieved targets in the past? This white paper answers all of the above.
This free white paper is currently in the final stages of preparation.

Register here to receive the White Paper when it is first released

Your Email (the white paper will be sent to your inbox)

Your Full Name (required)


We respect your email privacy.
Tagged with:
Feb 21

“The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that is close to their experience. Android came on the scene just over 2 years ago, and this week they took our leadership position in smartphone volumes. Unbelievable.”

This is just one of many brutally honest statements from Nokia’s CEO, Stephen Elop written in what is now a famous memo allegedly sent by him to his staff (see full memo below).  In this memo he gives his unadulterated assessment of how and why Nokia have lost their footing in the global mobile device market to Apple and others. If you haven’t seen this already, it’s a must read!

Click to view in full size - 333 people's opinions of Stephen Elop's comments

Click to view in full size - 333 people's opinions of Stephen Elop's comments

I wanted to share this with our readers to talk about it from a leadership communication perspective, as it’s like nothing I’ve seen before. The memo Elop sent to his staff (originally published by engadget.com) is really quite disturbing in a way. But overall I think it’s positive. It’s my belief that you need to disturb people and make them feel uncomfortable about the way they do things now if you want to create radical change in behavior, which Nokia clearly need to as their survival seems to depends on it. Since this memo was sent, Nokia and Microsoft have announced a broad strategic partnership.  Nokia will release its Windows Phone 7 smartphone by the end of 2011.  This seems to be Nokia’s lifeline, and after reading Elop’s memo below, perhaps it is the only ‘platform’ possible from which to go about salvaging their lost market share.  Elop was employed by Microsoft as their President as recently as 6 months ago.

Enough from me. Here’s Stephen Elop’s memo to his staff below. What do you think?


 Hello there,

There is a pertinent story about a man who was working on an oil platform in the North Sea. He woke up one night from a loud explosion, which suddenly set his entire oil platform on fire. In mere moments, he was surrounded by flames. Through the smoke and heat, he barely made his way out of the chaos to the platform’s edge. When he looked down over the edge, all he could see were the dark, cold, foreboding Atlantic waters.

As the fire approached him, the man had mere seconds to react. He could stand on the platform, and inevitably be consumed by the burning flames. Or, he could plunge 30 meters in to the freezing waters. The man was standing upon a “burning platform,” and he needed to make a choice.

He decided to jump. It was unexpected. In ordinary circumstances, the man would never consider plunging into icy waters. But these were not ordinary times – his platform was on fire. The man survived the fall and the waters. After he was rescued, he noted that a “burning platform” caused a radical change in his behaviour.

We too, are standing on a “burning platform,” and we must decide how we are going to change our behaviour.

Over the past few months, I’ve shared with you what I’ve heard from our shareholders, operators, developers, suppliers and from you. Today, I’m going to share what I’ve learned and what I have come to believe.

I have learned that we are standing on a burning platform.

And, we have more than one explosion – we have multiple points of scorching heat that are fuelling a blazing fire around us.

For example, there is intense heat coming from our competitors, more rapidly than we ever expected. Apple disrupted the market by redefining the smartphone and attracting developers to a closed, but very powerful ecosystem.

In 2008, Apple’s market share in the $300+ price range was 25 percent; by 2010 it escalated to 61 percent. They are enjoying a tremendous growth trajectory with a 78 percent earnings growth year over year in Q4 2010. Apple demonstrated that if designed well, consumers would buy a high-priced phone with a great experience and developers would build applications. They changed the game, and today, Apple owns the high-end range.

And then, there is Android. In about two years, Android created a platform that attracts application developers, service providers and hardware manufacturers. Android came in at the high-end, they are now winning the mid-range, and quickly they are going downstream to phones under €100. Google has become a gravitational force, drawing much of the industry’s innovation to its core.

Let’s not forget about the low-end price range. In 2008, MediaTek supplied complete reference designs for phone chipsets, which enabled manufacturers in the Shenzhen region of China to produce phones at an unbelievable pace. By some accounts, this ecosystem now produces more than one third of the phones sold globally – taking share from us in emerging markets.

While competitors poured flames on our market share, what happened at Nokia? We fell behind, we missed big trends, and we lost time. At that time, we thought we were making the right decisions; but, with the benefit of hindsight, we now find ourselves years behind.

The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that is close to their experience. Android came on the scene just over 2 years ago, and this week they took our leadership position in smartphone volumes. Unbelievable.

We have some brilliant sources of innovation inside Nokia, but we are not bringing it to market fast enough. We thought MeeGo would be a platform for winning high-end smartphones. However, at this rate, by the end of 2011, we might have only one MeeGo product in the market.

At the midrange, we have Symbian. It has proven to be non-competitive in leading markets like North America. Additionally, Symbian is proving to be an increasingly difficult environment in which to develop to meet the continuously expanding consumer requirements, leading to slowness in product development and also creating a disadvantage when we seek to take advantage of new hardware platforms. As a result, if we continue like before, we will get further and further behind, while our competitors advance further and further ahead.

At the lower-end price range, Chinese OEMs are cranking out a device much faster than, as one Nokia employee said only partially in jest, “the time that it takes us to polish a PowerPoint presentation.” They are fast, they are cheap, and they are challenging us.

And the truly perplexing aspect is that we’re not even fighting with the right weapons. We are still too often trying to approach each price range on a device-to-device basis.

The battle of devices has now become a war of ecosystems, where ecosystems include not only the hardware and software of the device, but developers, applications, ecommerce, advertising, search, social applications, location-based services, unified communications and many other things. Our competitors aren’t taking our market share with devices; they are taking our market share with an entire ecosystem. This means we’re going to have to decide how we either build, catalyse or join an ecosystem.

This is one of the decisions we need to make. In the meantime, we’ve lost market share, we’ve lost mind share and we’ve lost time.

On Tuesday, Standard & Poor’s informed that they will put our A long term and A-1 short term ratings on negative credit watch. This is a similar rating action to the one that Moody’s took last week. Basically it means that during the next few weeks they will make an analysis of Nokia, and decide on a possible credit rating downgrade. Why are these credit agencies contemplating these changes? Because they are concerned about our competitiveness.

Consumer preference for Nokia declined worldwide. In the UK, our brand preference has slipped to 20 percent, which is 8 percent lower than last year. That means only 1 out of 5 people in the UK prefer Nokia to other brands. It’s also down in the other markets, which are traditionally our strongholds: Russia, Germany, Indonesia, UAE, and on and on and on.

How did we get to this point? Why did we fall behind when the world around us evolved?

This is what I have been trying to understand. I believe at least some of it has been due to our attitude inside Nokia. We poured gasoline on our own burning platform. I believe we have lacked accountability and leadership to align and direct the company through these disruptive times. We had a series of misses. We haven’t been delivering innovation fast enough. We’re not collaborating internally.

Nokia, our platform is burning.

We are working on a path forward — a path to rebuild our market leadership. When we share the new strategy on February 11, it will be a huge effort to transform our company. But, I believe that together, we can face the challenges ahead of us. Together, we can choose to define our future.

The burning platform, upon which the man found himself, caused the man to shift his behaviour, and take a bold and brave step into an uncertain future. He was able to tell his story. Now, we have a great opportunity to do the same.

Stephen.


Please comment below, tell us your thoughts.     


P.S. – For more sales insights, SUBSCRIBE for email updates.


Tagged with:
Copyright © 2012 Harlow Group Pty Ltd
preload preload preload